Todd Kelsey's third chapter in
Surfing the Tsunami, he tackles the spectrum of optimism to pessimism and the sweet spot in between (the realism). He shares some links to some terrific articles with various points of view on the topic of Artificial Intelligence's impact on the job market. "In a nutshell, there are plenty of opportunities to be optimistic,
if a society invests enough in its citizens."
The New York Times article The Robots Are Coming, and Sweden Is Fine provides a great juxtaposition between USA and Sweden.
"In the United States, where most people depend on employers for health insurance, losing a job can trigger a descent to catastrophic depths. It makes workers reluctant to leave jobs to forge potentially more lucrative careers. It makes unions inclined to protect jobs above all else.
Yet in Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia, governments provide health care along with free education. They pay generous unemployment benefits, while employers finance extensive job training programs. Unions generally embrace automation as a competitive advantage that makes jobs more secure." (Goodman, 2017)
America typically does not take the long view on many topics, desiring instant gratification (here and now is what is most urgent!) over critical thinking, contingency planning, and strategy. Corporations prioritize profits over jobs in the USA, when really, the Swedes have it right, “If we don’t move forward with the technology and making money, well, then we are out of business,” says Magnus Westerlund, 35, vice chairman of a local union chapter representing laborers at two Boliden mines. “You don’t need a degree in math to do the calculation.” (Goodman, 2017)
I think schools and government at local, state and national levels should partner with futurists and companies large and small to understand the current job need and what is coming in the future: 5, 10, or 20 years from now to shape curriculum and job training so the job force flexes with commerce. For sure the The Great Resignation is a sign in the USA that employees do hold a modicum of power to not tolerate low pay, few benefits, long commutes and/or work days; however, it did serve to make companies aware, more than ever before, that employees don't need to be in a cubicle to prove they are working. Companies might be facing the question: what is the need for a headquarters/office (and that overhead) if employees can work from home? As more tasks get automated, it'll generate a similar question: what do we need humans to (still) do versus a robot?
Cinema captured what, to me, is the right approach in the true story of NASA computing.
Check out a
short BTS video of Hidden Figures which showed what happened when IBM computers replaced human computers.
Reference:
Goodman, P. (2017, December 27). The Robots Are Coming, and Sweden Is Fine. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/27/business/the-robots-are-coming-and-sweden-is-fine.html